Price Match
Open Challenge

We offer a $1000 service credit to anyone who has a lower price or higher performance than we offer publicly at any equivalent service level and volume.

Argus Verify has a standing challenge.

We offer a $1000 service credit to anyone who has a lower price or higher performance than we offer publicly at any equivalent service level and volume.

What This Means

If you have a lower price to fulfill orders, either via an external vendor OR with your own internal team, with a comparable SLA and success rate, we concede.

Why do we do this?

We use so we can learn from others best practices if their apples-to-apples:

  • costs are meaningfully lower than ours
  • performance is meaningfully higher than ours

To do this, please demonstrate:

  • For external vendors, last 3 months of invoices with comparable scale and SLA
  • For internal labor, 3 months attributed labor, orders, and SLA

We are happy to sign non-disclosure agreements to facilitate this if required.

We can't fairly compete against either (A) significantly different SLAs or (B) non-fully loaded costs, we require some credible way to demonstrate that we aren't competing against the wrong thing.

For example we wouldn't consider these reasonable comparisons:

  • someone has a raw hourly rate of $4/hr, but there is a fully loaded cost, EOR, software, management attribution, etc.
  • another vendor is offering 3 days/3 any touches vs our 5 days/multiple touches per day per contact + docs + 3PV handling.